CBA Pro V4.0 — now live

Turn the work you've actually done into a regulator-shaped CBA

CBA Pro takes one competency at a time from blank page to submission-ready — matched to your own projects, written inside your regulator's character limit, reviewed and graded before an assessor ever sees it.

Built around your regulator's own frameworkOne-time pricing from $97 — no subscriptionRun one full competency free, end to endBuilt by Canadian P.Eng professionalsBuilt around your regulator's own frameworkOne-time pricing from $97 — no subscriptionRun one full competency free, end to endBuilt by Canadian P.Eng professionals

No card required. Everything you write on the free competency carries over when you upgrade.

Competency 3.2 · Progressive responsibility
  1. 1Select best experienceContinue
  2. 2Answer missing detailsFree
  3. 3Generate preliminary draft1 credit
  4. 4Review and improve1 credit
  5. 5Finalize draftOn demand
Mark competency completeFinish step 1 first

The core loop

Five steps per competency, and the first two are free

Match your experience, close the gaps, draft, review, finalize. Ranking and question generation cost nothing, so you can open a competency and see whether it is the one to write today before spending anything.

  • Exactly one pulsing next action, never two
  • Step back at any point — nothing you have written is lost
  • Every paid action shows its credit cost on the button
How the workspace works
Competency 3.2 · Progressive responsibility
  1. 1Select best experienceContinue
  2. 2Answer missing detailsFree
  3. 3Generate preliminary draft1 credit
  4. 4Review and improve1 credit
  5. 5Finalize draftOn demand
Mark competency completeFinish step 1 first

Built for your regulator

APEGA 3.2 is Finances and Budget. National 3.2 isn't.

Ask a general-purpose chatbot about “competency 3.2” and it will answer without telling you which framework it used. In CBA Pro your association decides the catalog, the count, the character limits and the rubric behind every review.

  • All 12 Canadian regulators selectable — EGBC, APEGA, APEGS, PEO and more
  • APEGA runs its own official 22-competency prompt library
  • APEGA's 8 mandatory Canadian-equivalent competencies are flagged
See how regulators differ
Your association sets the framework

APEGA

Alberta

Competency 3.2

Finances and Budget

  • 22 competencies required
  • 1,500 characters per example

PEO

Ontario

Competency 3.2

Progressive Responsibility

  • 34 competencies required
  • 1,500 characters per example

Same code, different competency. Ask a general-purpose chatbot for “competency 3.2” and it cannot tell you which framework it answered from.

The headline promise

It didn't guess. That's the point.

Every draft is a complete Situation–Action–Outcome inside your regulator's character limit — and everything the AI could not know from your own answers comes back as a bracketed placeholder for you to fill.

  • No invented standard, clause, metric, date, employer or outcome
  • Character limit measured while writing and re-checked server-side
  • A guided wizard walks the placeholders one at a time
Why it refuses to guess
Step 3 · Preliminary draft

Situation / Action / Outcome

Writing…

Situation

Action

Outcome

3 placeholders to fill

It didn't know the station name, the standard, or your measured clearance — so it didn't guess. That's the point.

Before an assessor sees it

A reviewer that marks up your exact words

Comments anchored inside the draft with a numbered chip at each mark, each carrying a suggested rewrite you can accept in one click — and handed to you one job at a time rather than fifteen at once.

  • Click a chip, its comment card scrolls into view
  • “Use this wording in my draft” swaps the passage in place
  • Track changes as a view you toggle: insertions green, deletions struck red
Inside the reviewer pass
Step 4 · Review and improve

Action

I recalculated the horizontal curve and the team decided on the transition spiral length, then carried the chosen alignment through IFC.

1

Reviewer comment · Individual contribution

“The team decided” hides what you did. Assessors reject examples where the applicant's own decision can't be separated from the group's.

Use this wording in my draft

Placeholders first, comments second — the rail hands out one job at a time.

Two verdicts

Know if it's ready before you find out the hard way

A submit-readiness letter grade that re-runs itself on your newest edits, and the 0–5 self-assessment rating you will actually put on the application — coloured against your regulator's published minimum.

  • Both are free — an automatic call that spends a credit is a bug
  • It names the version it graded, so the verdict is never stale
  • It never inflates a rating to reach a minimum; it names the shortfall
How grading works
Submit-readiness grade
C+
Needs real work

Weakest section: Outcome

Graded on draft v5 · free, no credit spent

Self-assessment score

2

Below your regulator's minimum of 3 — the shortfall is named, not rounded up.

Everything in CBA Pro V4.0

Each one has its own page with the detail, the demo and the reasoning behind how it works.

One-time pricing. No subscription.

Pick the plan that matches your regulator's competency count. Upgrades are pay-the-difference, so nothing you write on a smaller plan is lost.

Foundation

For applicants with a shorter competency list, or who want to prove the workflow out on real competencies first.

$97CAD one-time
  • 10 competencies
  • 20 AI draft generations
  • The full five-step workspace on every competency
  • Reviewer pass with anchored comments and one-click rewrites
  • Submit-readiness grade + 0–5 self-assessment score
  • Version history — nothing you write is ever overwritten
  • 10% off a human P.Eng review
Get Foundation
Most popular

Progression

The standard 22-competency path, with Word and PDF export so your drafts leave the app submission-ready.

$197CAD one-time
  • 22 competencies
  • 45 AI draft generations
  • Export to Word & PDF
  • Everything in Foundation
  • Branded Word / PDF export, per competency
  • CV import — turn your résumé into a structured evidence base
  • Points, streaks and league credits worth real money
  • 20% off a human P.Eng review
Get Progression

Professional

The full 34-competency framework with the complete final report — for anyone submitting a full CBA.

$297CAD one-time
  • All 34 competencies
  • 70 AI draft generations
  • Full final-report export
  • Everything in Progression
  • Full application export as one branded report
  • Highest draft-generation allowance for heavy rewriting
  • Gold league reachable — $50 in credits
  • 20% off a human P.Eng review
Get Professional

Not ready to pay? Run one full competency free.

Every step, on a real competency, with no card — and every word carries over when you upgrade.

Start free

Trusted by engineers across Canada

M

M. Ibrahim

This was a wonderful experience. Hossein and Jenny were very helpful and prompt to reply to my emails and questions. Hossein got on a call with me before enrolling just to answer my questions. The review for my CBA questions was detailed, thorough with clear direction on what needs to be done to improve, which made it very easy for me to fix my answers. They gave me a time for looking into my CBA questions. They ended up delivering earlier than promised. Finally, they are very fairly priced. Definitely recommend their service for anyone looking to get someone to assess their CBA answers.

1 week ago

CBA Pro FAQ

CBA Pro is Competency-Based Assessment software for engineers applying for a P.Eng licence in Canada. It takes one competency at a time through five steps — match the right work experience, answer questions drawn from that competency's own indicators, generate a Situation–Action–Outcome draft inside your regulator's character limit, run a reviewer pass over it, and finalize — then grades the result and gives you the 0–5 self-assessment score your text supports.

V4.0 is a rebuild rather than an update. The biggest changes: a five-step workspace with one pulsing next action at all times, reviewer comments anchored to the exact words they refer to with one-click rewrites, a submit-readiness grade that re-runs itself on your newest edits, immutable version history so nothing is ever overwritten, CV import that saves nothing until you approve each record, and regulator-specific frameworks including APEGA's own official 22-competency set.

No, and it is built so that it cannot. Your CBA must be based on your own engineering experience. CBA Pro will not invent a project, inflate a role, add an outcome or claim a standard — anything it does not have from your own answers comes back as a bracketed placeholder for you to fill. You choose the evidence, supply the facts, and approve the final wording.

All twelve Canadian engineering regulators are selectable, including EGBC (British Columbia), APEGA (Alberta), APEGS (Saskatchewan), PEO (Ontario), Engineers Geoscientists Manitoba, Engineers Nova Scotia and OIQ. Your association sets the competency catalog, the number of competencies, the per-example character limit and the rubric used for review — and APEGA has its own dedicated 22-competency framework rather than a relabelled national one.

One-time pricing, no subscription: Foundation is $97 CAD for 10 competencies, Progression is $197 for 22 competencies with Word and PDF export, and Professional is $297 for all 34 with the full final report. Upgrades are pay-the-difference, so nothing you write on a smaller plan is lost. There is also a Free plan that runs one full competency end to end.

Yes. The Free plan gives you one complete competency — every step, including the reviewer pass, the submit-readiness grade and the self-assessment score — with no credit card. Everything you write on it carries over if you upgrade.

Regulators require that the experience and judgment in your CBA are genuinely yours. Using software to organise, structure, question and review your own writing is no different in kind from using a template or a mentor's feedback. What matters is that the substance is yours — and CBA Pro is built so it cannot supply substance you did not give it. Unknown facts become placeholders, never guesses.

Yes, and it is a common reason people start. Paste an existing draft into the workspace and run the reviewer pass and the grade on it, or start again from step 1 with a better-matched project. CertNova also offers a separate rejection-support service for decoding assessor comments and planning a resubmission.

Yes. A licensed P.Eng can read your finished submission line by line through Review by P.Eng — three tiers by competency count, a five-business-day turnaround target, and one complimentary meeting with your reviewer included. Buying a CBA Pro plan mints a discount code for it automatically.

In short

CBA Pro is CertNova's Competency-Based Assessment software for engineers seeking a P.Eng licence in Canada. Each competency runs through a five-step workspace: rank the applicant's own recorded work experiences against the competency (free), answer gap questions generated from that competency's indicators and reviewer expectations (free), generate a Situation–Action–Outcome draft inside the regulator's character limit, run a reviewer pass with comments anchored to the draft text and one-click rewrites, and finalize. Every competency then receives a submit-readiness letter grade that re-runs on the newest edits and a 0–5 self-assessment score measured against the regulator's minimum, both free of charge. The applicant's association (EGBC, APEGA, APEGS, PEO and all other Canadian regulators) determines the competency catalog, count, character limits and rubric; APEGA uses its own official 22-competency framework. A hard non-invention rule means any fact the applicant has not supplied appears as a bracketed placeholder rather than a guess, so the substance of the submission is always the applicant's own. Pricing is one-time with pay-the-difference upgrades: Foundation $97 CAD (10 competencies), Progression $197 (22, with Word/PDF export), Professional $297 (34, with the full report), plus a Free plan covering one complete competency.

Write the first one tonight

One full competency, end to end, free. If it doesn't make the rest of your CBA look manageable, you have lost an evening — not a submission cycle.