CBA Draft Review

A licensed P.Eng reads every competency, line by line, before you submit

You have written your competencies. The question is whether an assessor will read them the way you meant them. We check that before your regulator does, not after.

Flat price per competency band. No hourly billing, no retainer.

5.0 stars on Google500+ P.Eng applicants supportedReviewed by licensed Canadian engineersPEO, APEGA, EGBC, APEGS, EGM5.0 stars on Google500+ P.Eng applicants supportedReviewed by licensed Canadian engineersPEO, APEGA, EGBC, APEGS, EGM

What comes back to you

  • Every competency read against your regulator's rubric
  • Comments anchored to your own sentences
  • The gaps an assessor is most likely to flag
  • What to add, and where the evidence should come from
  • A second read after you revise, at no extra cost

Start with one competency, free

Send one of your written competencies and a licensed P.Eng will read it. No card, no obligation. If you would rather have the whole set read now, you can book from the same form at 10% off.

Step 1 of 2 Reviewed by a licensed P.Eng

First, who are we reviewing for?

So your reviewer knows which regulator and discipline to read your competencies against.

No spam. We only use your details to help with your CBA.

  • Your work stays your work. We comment, you write.
  • We are not your regulator and we do not speak to them on your behalf.
  • Your files go to your reviewer only. They are never shared.

Before you trust anyone with your CBA

This is not an AI handing your file back

Buyers tell us plainly that they are afraid of paying for a tool that runs their CBA through a model and returns it. A licensed P.Eng reads your competencies. The comments you get back quote your own sentences, because a person read them.

Your reviewer is licensed, and that matters to your regulator

An unlicensed consultant leaves you in a grey area your association may or may not accept. Every reviewer here holds a P.Eng in Canada. You are never guessing what your reviewer is qualified to be.

If competencies come back, we work on them again at no charge

We cannot promise an outcome and we will not pretend to. Your regulator decides, not us. What we can promise is that if your association returns any competency we reviewed, whether that is one of them or ten, we take it back and work through it with you again for free. That commitment is written into your confirmation email.

One flat price for the band you need

No hourly billing. A second read after you revise is included in every band.

Focused review

1–10 competencies

$297

one time, flat rate

You have a handful of competencies and want them read properly.

  • Every one of your 1–10 competencies read by a licensed P.Eng
  • Comments anchored to your own sentences
  • A second read after you revise, included
  • Free rework if your association returns one

Have 8 competencies? Use the remaining 2 for a second review.

Book my review
Most popular

Half set review

11–22 competencies

$597

one time, flat rate

You are partway through and want the weak ones found before you finish.

  • Every one of your 11–22 competencies read by a licensed P.Eng
  • Comments anchored to your own sentences
  • A second read after you revise, included
  • Free rework if your association returns one

Have 18 competencies? Use the remaining 4 for a second review.

Book my review

Full set review

23–34 competencies

$797

one time, flat rate

You have written the whole submission and want every competency read.

  • Every one of your 23–34 competencies read by a licensed P.Eng
  • Comments anchored to your own sentences
  • A second read after you revise, included
  • Free rework if your association returns one

Have 30 competencies? Use the remaining 4 for a second review.

Book my review

Not ready to book? Get one competency reviewed free first.

What assessors flag most often

Almost none of it is about the engineering experience itself. It is about how the writing evidences it.

The example describes the project, not your part in it
Assessors read for what you personally decided and did. A strong project written in the first person plural reads as team work.What we do: We mark every sentence where the subject is the team and show you where your own decision belongs.
The competency is asserted rather than demonstrated
Saying you applied a standard is not the same as showing the judgement you exercised when you applied it.What we do: We point to the exact line that asserts, and tell you what evidence turns it into a demonstration.
The example does not match the indicator being claimed
A good story filed under the wrong competency scores nothing, however well it is written.What we do: We map each example to the indicator it actually satisfies, and flag the ones that need moving.
The timeline does not support the level claimed
Dates, roles and validator coverage have to agree with the level of responsibility described.What we do: We read your CV against your examples and tell you where the two disagree.

How a review runs

  1. 1

    You send what you have written

    Upload your competencies and your CV. The CV is what lets your reviewer connect the examples to real projects rather than guessing.

  2. 2

    A licensed P.Eng reads every one

    Not a summary and not a score. Comments sit against your own words, competency by competency, against your regulator's rubric.

  3. 3

    You get the gaps, ranked

    What an assessor is most likely to flag first, what to add, and where the evidence should come from. You do the writing, because the work has to be yours.

  4. 4

    You revise, we read it again

    A second pass on the same competencies is included. Most applicants use it, and it is where the biggest jump usually happens.

What you get

  • Line by line comments on every competency you send
  • Each example mapped to the indicator it actually satisfies
  • Your CV read against your examples for timeline and role conflicts
  • A ranked list of what to fix first
  • A second read after you revise, included
  • Free rework if your association returns a competency we reviewed

This is for you if

  • You have drafted competencies and want them read before you submit.
  • You are unsure whether your examples demonstrate what you are claiming.
  • You have a submission date and want to stop revising in circles.
  • You want a licensed reviewer rather than an unlicensed consultant.
  • You are with PEO, APEGA, EGBC, APEGS, EGM or another Canadian regulator.

This is not for you if

  • You have not opened an account with your provincial association yet. Do that first, then come back.
  • You want someone to write your competencies for you. The work has to be yours, and we will not do that.
  • You already submitted and received comments or a rejection. That is a different service.
Already submitted and rejected? Go here instead

5.0 on Google from 50+ reviews

Read them
They were awesome to work with. They really understood how to take my project experience and turn it into something clear and professional. The team gave helpful feedback, quick responses, and made the process a lot smoother than trying to do it on my own.

Ravi Varman Pichandi

I used CertNova's services to help with my Competency-Based Assessment (CBA) for my P.Eng. application, and I'm really happy with how it went. Their support saved me a lot of time and effort. The team was really knowledgeable, and easy to understand and work with. They made the whole process a lot less stressful. I'd definitely recommend CertNova to anyone working through the CBA or on the path to getting their P.Eng. license.

Arshia Mousavi

I used CertNova to help prepare my Competency-Based Assessment (CBA) for my P.Eng. application, and I couldn't be more satisfied. Their support saved me a significant amount of time and effort, especially when it came to organizing and articulating my experience in line with regulatory expectations. The team was knowledgeable, efficient, and easy to work with. I highly recommend CertNova to anyone navigating the CBA process.

Alireza Ghane

Quick answers

What is a CBA draft review?

A licensed Canadian P.Eng reads competencies you have already written and comments on them against your regulator's rubric, before you submit them. You keep authorship. The reviewer identifies gaps and tells you what evidence is missing.

Who reads my competencies?

A professional engineer licensed in Canada. Not a model, and not an unlicensed consultant. Comments are anchored to your own sentences.

How much does a CBA review cost?

A flat price by competency band: $297 for 1 to 10, $597 for 11 to 22, $797 for 23 to 34. One price, no hourly billing, and a second read after you revise is included.

How long does a review take?

Most reviews come back within a few business days. If you have a submission deadline, say so on the intake form and it is prioritised.

Will you write my CBA for me?

No. Your regulator requires the submission to be your own work, and it has to stay that way. We comment, rank the gaps and tell you what evidence is missing. You write.

What happens if a competency is returned?

If your association returns any competency we reviewed, we work through it with you again at no charge. That is written into your confirmation email.

Questions people ask before booking

Yes. Every reviewer holds a P.Eng licence in Canada. This is the part most applicants are checking for, because an unlicensed reviewer can leave you in a grey area your association may not accept.

No. A licensed P.Eng reads your competencies and writes the comments. You can tell, because the comments quote your own sentences and refer to your own projects. We use software to help you draft, and that product is CBA Pro, but a review is a person reading your work.

No, and be careful with anyone who says otherwise. Your regulator makes that decision. What we commit to is that a licensed engineer reads every competency you send, and that if any of them come back, we work on them again for free.

No. Send the ones you want read. Pricing is banded, so if you have 8 competencies the 1 to 10 band covers them and you can use the remaining slots for a second review later.

This is for competencies you have not submitted yet. If you have already submitted and received assessor comments or a rejection, the rejection service is built for that situation instead.

Because the fastest way to strengthen a weak competency is usually a project you already worked on and did not think to use. Your reviewer reads the CV alongside your examples, and it is also how timeline and role conflicts get caught.

They go to your reviewer and nowhere else. We do not share them with your regulator, and we do not use them as examples for anyone else.

Yes. Send one competency through the form on this page and a reviewer will look at it free. It is one of 34, so it is enough to see how we work rather than enough to submit, but there is no charge and no card required.

CertNova CBA Draft Review: a licensed Canadian professional engineer reads P.Eng competency examples line by line before submission and returns comments anchored to the applicant's own text, mapped to the regulator's rubric. Flat pricing by competency band ($297 for 1 to 10, $597 for 11 to 22, $797 for 23 to 34), a second read after revision included, and free rework if the association returns a reviewed competency. Applicants retain authorship. Supports PEO, APEGA, EGBC, APEGS and EGM.

Have one competency read before you decide anything

It costs nothing, it takes one upload, and it tells you more about your submission than another week of revising will.