The wrong example
Your project may be impressive, but it may not demonstrate the competency being assessed.
Fix: We help you choose or reframe examples that better match the indicator.
If your Competency-Based Assessment was scored low, returned with comments, or refused by your association, CertNova helps you understand what went wrong and how to revise it ethically.
A rejected CBA does not always mean you lack experience. Often, it means your experience was not explained in the way assessors needed to see it.
I have assessor comments, help me understand them
No guarantee of approval. No ghostwriting. Clear guidance based on your own experience.
Start with your situation. Assessor comments are enough for an initial free review, you do not need your full CBA yet.
We use this to understand your situation and follow up.
No spam. We only use your details to help with your CBA.
Many applicants with strong engineering backgrounds receive comments or low scores because their examples do not clearly show personal responsibility, engineering judgment, decision-making, or outcomes. The issue is often not the work you did, it is how the work was explained.
The wrong example
Your project may be impressive, but it may not demonstrate the competency being assessed.
Fix: We help you choose or reframe examples that better match the indicator.
The job description trap
You described your role or team responsibilities instead of your personal engineering actions.
Fix: We help you show what you personally did, decided, and delivered.
Missing engineering judgment
The assessor cannot see your reasoning, trade-offs, constraints, or decisions.
Fix: We help you bring out the why behind your actions.
Weak outcome
Your example ends without a clear result, impact, or lesson learned.
Fix: We help connect your action to a specific outcome.
Training instead of evidence
You listed courses, standards, or knowledge instead of real project-based application.
Fix: We help convert knowledge into demonstrated experience where appropriate.
Not enough alignment
Your answer does not clearly connect to the competency indicators.
Fix: We help map your experience back to the expected evidence.
You leave with clarity, not more confusion.
We look at the assessor feedback, low-scoring competencies, and the parts of your CBA that caused concern.
We determine whether the issue is example selection, missing personal action, weak engineering judgment, unclear outcome, or poor indicator alignment.
You receive clear direction on what to add, remove, restructure, or explain differently.
You keep ownership of your experience while improving clarity, structure, and evidence.
If needed, continue with CBA Review or CBA Writing Consulting for deeper support.
CBA Rejection Support is not a ghostwriting service. We do not invent experience, copy examples, or promise approval. We help you understand the feedback, improve your evidence, and revise your own CBA honestly and clearly.
“They were awesome to work with. They really understood how to take my project experience and turn it into something clear and professional. The team gave helpful feedback, quick responses, and made the process a lot smoother than trying to do it on my own.”
“I used CertNova's services to help with my Competency-Based Assessment (CBA) for my P.Eng. application, and I'm really happy with how it went. Their support saved me a lot of time and effort.”
“I used CertNova to help prepare my Competency-Based Assessment (CBA) for my P.Eng. application, and I couldn't be more satisfied. Their support saved me a significant amount of time and effort, especially when it came to organizing and articulating my experience in line with regulatory expectations. The team was knowledgeable, efficient, and easy to work with. I highly recommend CertNova to anyone navigating the CBA process.”
Not sure which one fits? Start with a free 15-minute review.
Best for: Understanding whether CertNova can help and what your next step should be.
Best for: Applicants who received comments, low scores, or rejection and need a revision plan.
Best for: Applicants who need help revising multiple competencies or rebuilding their submission.
Choose your situation and we'll point you to the right next step.
Get a CBA Review before submission.
Get My CBA ReviewedUse CBA Rejection Support to understand and fix the issue.
Fix My Rejected CBAUse CBA Pro to structure your examples from the beginning.
Start CBA ProBook CBA Writing Consulting for 1-on-1 support.
Book ConsultingUse NPPE Pro for exam-style NPPE preparation.
Start NPPE ProIf your P.Eng CBA was rejected or returned with comments, start by reviewing the assessor feedback carefully. The issue is often unclear evidence, weak personal responsibility, missing engineering judgment, or poor alignment with competency indicators. CertNova's CBA Rejection Support helps you understand the comments, identify the root cause, and build an ethical revision plan.
No. A rejected CBA does not always mean you lack engineering experience. Many applicants have strong experience but do not explain it in the way assessors expect. The goal is to make your personal actions, engineering decisions, and outcomes clearer.
CertNova can help you understand assessor comments, identify gaps, and revise your CBA ethically. CertNova does not guarantee approval, does not act as a regulator, and does not ghostwrite your experience.
CBA Pro can help if you need to restructure your examples and improve clarity across multiple competencies. If you already have specific rejection comments, start with CBA Rejection Support or CBA Review, then use CBA Pro as needed to organize your revisions.
CBA Review is best before submission when you want expert feedback on a draft. CBA Rejection Support is best after you receive comments, low scores, or rejection and need help understanding the feedback and planning your resubmission.
Your CBA must remain based on your own engineering experience. CertNova helps you understand assessor comments, identify gaps, improve structure, and revise ethically. We do not ghostwrite your experience or guarantee regulator approval.
CertNova is not an engineering regulator. The final assessment decision belongs to your association.
A rejected P.Eng CBA usually means the assessor could not see enough evidence for one or more competency indicators. It may not mean you lack experience. It often means your CBA did not clearly show your personal actions, engineering judgment, decisions, outcomes, or alignment with the required competency.
Yes. CertNova offers CBA Rejection Support for applicants who received comments, low scores, or rejection from their engineering association. CertNova helps you understand the feedback, identify gaps, and build a clear revision plan based on your own experience.
No. CertNova is not an engineering regulator and cannot guarantee approval. Your regulator makes the final decision. CertNova helps you improve clarity, structure, evidence, and alignment before resubmission.
No. CBA Pro does not write or ghostwrite your CBA. CBA Pro helps you organize your own experience, structure your examples, identify gaps, and improve clarity. Your CBA must remain based on your own engineering work.
CBA Review is usually for applicants who have not submitted yet and want feedback before submission. CBA Rejection Support is for applicants who already submitted their CBA and received comments, low scores, or rejection from their association.
Send the assessor comments, low-score feedback, the competencies that were flagged, and the relevant CBA examples if available. You do not need to send everything before the first free review; assessor comments are often enough to start.
That is exactly what CBA Rejection Support is designed for. CertNova helps translate assessor comments into clear action steps so you know what to revise, what evidence is missing, and what to prioritize.
Many CBA rejections happen because the written example does not clearly show personal responsibility, engineering judgment, decision-making, or outcomes. Your experience may be strong, but the assessor needs to see the evidence clearly in your CBA response.
Yes. CertNova can help you decide whether your current example should be revised, reframed, or replaced with a stronger experience example that better matches the competency indicators.
Not always. If your issue is limited to a few comments, a consultation may be enough. If your CBA needs broader restructuring, CBA Pro can help you organize and revise multiple competency examples more efficiently.
NPPE Pro is for National Professional Practice Examination preparation, not CBA rejection support. However, many P.Eng applicants need both NPPE preparation and CBA support during their licensing journey. CertNova offers NPPE Pro for exam preparation and CBA Pro / CBA Rejection Support for Competency-Based Assessment.
Yes. Internationally trained engineers applying for P.Eng licensure in Canada can use CertNova's CBA Rejection Support if their CBA was returned, rejected, or commented on by a Canadian engineering association.
No. CertNova does not fabricate, copy, or ghostwrite your CBA. The support focuses on helping you understand the comments, improve structure, clarify your own actions, and revise ethically.
Request a free 15-minute review or book CBA Rejection Support as soon as possible, especially if you have a resubmission deadline. Turnaround depends on your situation and current availability.
The first step is to share the assessor comments or describe what happened. CertNova can then help you understand whether you need CBA Rejection Support, CBA Review, CBA Writing Consulting, or CBA Pro.
CertNova's CBA Rejection Support helps Canadian P.Eng applicants who received comments, low scores, or rejection on their Competency-Based Assessment. The service helps applicants understand assessor feedback, identify missing evidence, improve clarity, and revise their CBA ethically before resubmission. CertNova also offers CBA Pro, CBA Review, CBA Writing Consulting, Free CBA Assessment, and NPPE Pro as part of the broader P.Eng licensing support journey.
If your CBA was rejected or returned with comments, get a clear revision plan before you spend more time rewriting.
Ethical support. No ghostwriting. No approval guarantees. Just clear guidance for your next revision.