CertNova
The non-negotiable

It didn't guess. That's the point.

You sign your Competency-Based Assessment, so anything invented in it is your problem, not your software's. That is why CBA Pro is held by a harness that never invents a fact, and leaves a placeholder wherever one is missing.

  • No invented standard, clause, metric, date, employer or outcome
  • Unknown facts become bracketed placeholders you fill
  • The consent step states this in plain words before you start
Step 3 · Preliminary draft

Situation / Action / Outcome

Writing…

Situation

Action

Outcome

3 placeholders to fill

It didn't know the station name, the standard, or your measured clearance, so it didn't guess. That's the point.

A rule, not a disclaimer

Every AI writing tool has a paragraph somewhere about verifying the output. That paragraph is doing nothing. If the model produces a fluent, specific, plausible sentence containing a number it made up, the odds that a tired applicant catches it at 11pm are not good.

CBA Pro takes the opposite approach: make the gap visible instead of filling it. The core prompt rules bar the model from supplying any fact it was not given. Where a fact is missing, the output contains a bracket, such as [applicable standard], [measured outcome] or [start date], that is hard to miss. A guided wizard walks you through each one, and the readiness hint names any that are left.

This is also stated to you before you write anything. The onboarding consent step says what the AI will not do (invent projects, inflate your role, add outcomes you did not achieve, or claim standards you did not apply) and asks you to confirm you have read it, rather than burying it in the terms.

Where the rule shows up

  1. 1

    In the CV import

    The parser leaves blanks blank, never merges two employers into one record, and takes each job title exactly as written: an intern stays an intern.

  2. 2

    In the draft

    Every fact not supplied by you comes back bracketed. The draft is complete in structure and honest about content.

  3. 3

    In the review

    Suggested rewrites carry their own brackets. Apply one and any new gap it introduces shows up in your placeholder wizard automatically.

  4. 4

    In the scoring

    The self-assessment score is instructed never to inflate a rating to reach your regulator's minimum. It reports the shortfall and names the missing evidence instead.

Why this matters more here than almost anywhere else

You are the signatory

A CBA is a declaration to a regulator about your own professional history. There is no version of 'the AI wrote it' that helps you if a detail does not hold up.

Assessors probe specifics

The details a model would invent (standards, tolerances, measured results) are exactly the details an assessor is most likely to ask you about.

It keeps the work yours

Your CBA has to reflect your own engineering work. A tool that fills gaps for you is quietly writing someone else's application under your name.

It tells you where to slow down

Because missing facts are marked rather than filled, you know where to look hardest: at the brackets, and at what the draft says it would not claim.

Is it ethical to use AI on a Competency-Based Assessment?

It can be, but your regulator draws the line, and the wording differs. PEO's April 2026 application form says: "If you have used AI tools or other aids in drafting your responses, you take full responsibility for ensuring the accuracy and authenticity of the information you have provided." APEGS's CBA declaration makes you responsible whether or not you used AI tools or editors. EGBC's guide is stricter: "the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and third parties to create or embellish workplace examples is strictly prohibited", and Engineers Geoscientists Manitoba, Engineers Nova Scotia and Engineers PEI also prohibit using AI to create or embellish examples.

Whatever the wording, the line runs through the substance. Choosing which project demonstrates a competency is yours. Stating what you personally decided is yours. Supplying the standard you worked to and the outcome you measured is yours. CBA Pro's part is the interview and the format: asking what your association looks for, shaping your answers into a Situation, Action and Outcome sized to a character limit, and showing where information is still missing.

CBA Pro is designed so that line is held by the tool rather than by your willpower at midnight. It is built to stay inside these rules: it doesn't create or embellish examples. It interviews you about your own work, formats only the facts you confirmed, never adds a project, a number or an outcome, and leaves a placeholder where one is missing. Every fact in your draft comes from your CV and your answers, and you review and own every word, so the responsibility stays yours too. No regulator endorses CBA Pro. Read your own regulator's current guide before you start, and if a regulator ever asks how the submission was prepared, that is the honest answer to give.

Trusted by P.Eng applicants across Canada

M

M. Ibrahim

“This was a wonderful experience. Hossein and Jenny were very helpful and prompt to reply to my emails and questions. Hossein got on a call with me before enrolling just to answer my questions. The review for my CBA questions was detailed, thorough with clear direction on what needs to be done to improve, which made it very easy for me to fix my answers. They gave me a time for looking into my CBA questions. They ended up delivering earlier than promised. Finally, they are very fairly priced. Definitely recommend their service for anyone looking to get someone to assess their CBA answers.”

2 months ago

It never makes it up: questions applicants ask

That is your regulator's call, and the rules differ. PEO asks you to take full responsibility for accuracy and authenticity if you used AI tools. EGBC, Engineers Geoscientists Manitoba, Engineers Nova Scotia and Engineers PEI prohibit using AI to create or embellish examples. CBA Pro is built to stay inside these rules: it doesn't create or embellish examples. It interviews you about your own work, formats only the facts you confirmed and marks anything missing as a placeholder, and you review and own every word. No regulator endorses CBA Pro, so read your own regulator's current guide before you start.

It is instructed never to invent a project, inflate the role you held, add an outcome you did not report, or claim a standard, code or clause you did not name. Where any of these is missing, it produces a placeholder instead.

You would have to click past it. The placeholder wizard walks you through each one, the readiness hint names any that are left, and marking a competency complete while the draft's placeholders are unfilled asks you to confirm first. CBA Pro never submits anything for you: you enter the final text in your regulator's form or portal yourself.

Yes. A suggested rewrite that would need a fact you have not supplied carries its own bracket, and applying the rewrite adds that bracket to your placeholder wizard automatically.

In short

Every AI step in CBA Pro runs under a non-invention rule: the model is instructed never to invent a project, inflate a role, add an outcome, or claim a standard, clause, metric, date or employer. Any fact the applicant has not supplied is emitted as a bracketed placeholder and walked through by a guided wizard; marking a competency complete while the draft's placeholders are unfilled requires the applicant to confirm. The rule is stated in the onboarding consent step and applies to CV parsing and suggested rewrites as well as drafting, so the substance of the submission stays the applicant's own. Regulators word their AI rules differently, and EGBC, Engineers Geoscientists Manitoba, Engineers Nova Scotia and Engineers PEI prohibit using AI to create or embellish workplace examples. CBA Pro is built to stay inside these rules: it does not create or embellish examples, and formats only what the applicant provides. No regulator endorses CBA Pro, and applicants should read their own regulator's guide.

Run one full competency, free

Every step, on a real competency, with no card. Everything you write carries over the moment you upgrade.