Blog

Technical competence is the foundation of professional engineering practice. In the PEng Technical Competencies, the Technical Competencies category stands out as a vital measure of an applicant’s ability to apply engineering principles effectively, safely, and innovatively. These competencies are not just about theoretical knowledge—they reflect an engineer’s capacity to solve real-world problems while adhering to rigorous standards and best practices.

The Technical Competencies category includes 10 key areas, ranging from understanding Canadian regulations and codes to ensuring quality management and safety in engineering projects. Together, these competencies are one of 7 categories of Competency-Based Assessment and demonstrate an applicant’s readiness for independent practice, ensuring they can tackle complex challenges while safeguarding public interest.

For engineers aspiring to earn their P.Eng. designation, mastering these competencies is essential. By demonstrating expertise across the full project lifecycle, integrating safety and risk management into designs, and adhering to ethical and professional standards, candidates not only meet the licensing requirements but also prepare themselves for the multifaceted demands of modern engineering roles. This blog will provide an in-depth look at the Technical Competencies category, offering insights and guidance on how to effectively showcase your expertise in this critical area of the PEng Technical Competencies in Competency Based Assessment.

 

What are Technical Competencies in the PEng CBA?

Technical competencies within the PEng Technical Competencies framework represent the cornerstone of an engineer’s professional expertise. These competencies ensure that applicants possess the technical knowledge, practical skills, and problem-solving abilities necessary to address the complex challenges of engineering practice.

The Engineering Associations such as PEO defines technical competencies as those skills that enable engineers to design, analyze, and implement solutions that are safe, reliable, and aligned with industry standards. Beyond individual expertise, these competencies also reflect an applicant’s ability to work within the unique context of Canadian regulations, codes, and practices. Whether it involves adhering to safety protocols, managing technical risks, or maintaining quality control, the emphasis is on ensuring public safety and engineering excellence.

Mastering the technical competencies is a key step toward demonstrating readiness for independent practice. From demonstrating knowledge of materials and project constraints to transferring design intentions into clear documentation, these competencies span the entire engineering lifecycle. In the next section, we’ll explore each of the 10 technical competencies in detail, including tips on how to effectively present your experience for the PEng CBA evaluation.

 

 

Breakdown of the 10 Technical Competencies

The PEng Technical competencies in Competency Based Assessment (CBA) requires applicants to demonstrate proficiency across 10 distinct technical competencies. Each competency reflects critical aspects of engineering practice and ensures that applicants are ready to handle complex projects independently. Below is an overview of these competencies and their significance.

 

Knowledge of Canadian Regulations, Codes, and Standards

Understanding and applying Canadian engineering regulations, codes, and standards are fundamental to ensuring compliance and public safety in the first item in technical competencies. Applicants must demonstrate their ability to identify and integrate these requirements into their engineering projects. Applicants must demonstrate familiarity with Canadian engineering regulations, including provincial, territorial, and indigenous codes and standards. This includes an understanding of local engineering practices and the ability to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. This matters as ensuring compliance with these frameworks is critical for maintaining public safety, meeting legal obligations, and delivering reliable engineering solutions.

For example, an applicant designing a bridge in Ontario might highlight how they integrated local building codes, accounted for provincial environmental standards, and ensured alignment with indigenous guidelines to meet regional requirements.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Situation

This situation demonstrates my understanding of the CEC, CSA and IEEE Standards. I was responsible for determining the substation installation that would be suitable on a temporary construction site and to determine required exterior lighting upgrades on existing buildings.

 

Action 

I was involved in the concept design preparing a report outlining options to improve lighting in the parking lot and walkways. When the final design was approved by my supervisor I was responsible for the design process. This included:

• Using a computerized lighting stimulation calculations were used to determine optimal pole locations, heights and light output levels specified by the IESNA.
• Calculating the required size of poles and concrete base to safely withstand wind and snow loading.
• Using CSA 22.1 I determined the size of the conductors and conduit. This was important as during construction I was required to ensure the contractor dug the trenches deep enough to meet CSA 22.1 requirements. Alternatives were used in areas where trenches could not be dug deep were used in site instruction to provide mechanical protection in accordance with the CEC (54-700) this allowed for the depth of underground conductors to be reduced by 300mm.
• I specified and sized circuit breakers and calculated voltage drop.
• I prepared the drawings and specification for the tender documents.
• I was responsible for reviewing the drawings that were provided by our customer and referenced the CEC 2015 requirements for high voltage installations and hydro interconnections standards Outcome

 

Outcome

I completed studies and determined the substation safe for the site and the public spaces. The ground fault protection settings were set and tested for safety limits as per the Canadian Electrical Code. The client was satisfied with the lighting upgrades on the existing buildings.

 

Knowledge of Materials, Operations, and Constraints

This is the second item of technical competencies that focuses on selecting appropriate materials and operations while addressing design constraints like cost, time, and labor. It also evaluates the applicant’s ability to manage interdisciplinary impacts effectively. This matters as engineering solutions must not only be functional but also economically and operationally feasible. For instance, a candidate designing a wastewater treatment plant could showcase their decision-making process in selecting corrosion-resistant materials while balancing project budget constraints and coordinating with environmental engineers.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Action

I managed and designed exterior lighting upgrades and provided a feasibility study for a large scale solar installation for our client.

 

Situation

• I met with the client’s project manager and reviewed the scope of the project with them. I completed a detailed review and inventory of existing exterior lighting. A reading of each light source at night was conducted to determine light level in each area, which was presented to the client along with several upgrade suggestions.
• A tender package was prepared that included specifications regarding sizing and material requirements for light standards and concrete basis, accepted lighting and performance requirements, accepted wireless controls systems and commissioning requirements, installation requirements and project management and safety requirements.
• I assisted with a connection impact assessment for generating solar power on a distribution grid connection. I evaluated existing lines and distance to the utility substation, X/R ratio, land classification and construction cost estimates.

 

Outcome

I contributed to a report to enable to use of existing utility distribution assets and to the multidisciplinary project for the completion of a solar installation which generates green energy. The upgrades to the existing buildings were complete contributing to the safety of the public. The client was satisfied with the project outcomes.

 

Risk Analysis and Mitigation

Risk analysis and mitigation are fundamental competencies that showcase an engineer’s ability to foresee potential technical risks and implement strategies to address them effectively. In the Technical competencies in PEng Competency Based Assessment (CBA), this competency emphasizes the importance of identifying areas of vulnerability in engineering projects, assessing their potential impacts, and applying solutions to reduce or eliminate risks. Effective risk management is essential because engineering projects often involve significant complexities and unknowns. By proactively identifying risks, engineers can prevent costly delays, safeguard the public, and ensure project success.

For example, an engineer working on a dam project might detail their approach to assessing seismic risks in the region. This could involve analyzing geological data, consulting with structural experts, and developing contingency plans for various scenarios. To mitigate these risks, the engineer could design structural reinforcements, incorporate fail-safe systems, and establish monitoring mechanisms for early detection of potential issues.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Action

I completed an arc flash report and mitigation study for an existing industrial plant.

 

Situation

Based on information gathered from a site visit and meeting with a technician I modeled the system in ETAP. I determined that the fault current could be controlled by setting and equipment changes. Using CSA Z462 I applied my knowledge of system protected to improve the system selectivity and lower tripping time. Where the fault currents could not be controlled through setting I proposed an upstream circuit breaker with an Arc reduction maintenance switch.

 

Outcome

A report outlining the arc flash hazard assessment and options to mitigate the arc flash risk.

 

Application of Engineering Knowledge to Design Solutions

One of the most critical competencies in the Technical competencies of PEng Competency Based Assessment (CBA) is the ability to apply engineering knowledge to develop practical and innovative design solutions. This competency evaluates how applicants utilize their technical expertise to create solutions tailored to specific project requirements. Beyond theoretical understanding, it requires engineers to demonstrate creativity, sound judgment, and the ability to solve unique challenges through calculated and well-documented approaches.

Effective application of engineering knowledge involves leveraging theories, calculations, and design principles to deliver outcomes that meet functional, safety, and economic goals. This competency highlights an engineer’s problem-solving capabilities and their readiness to make decisions under constraints such as limited resources, tight deadlines, or complex client requirements.

For instance, an applicant designing a solar energy system for a northern Canadian community might detail their process for addressing the challenge of limited sunlight during winter months. This could include optimizing the system’s tilt angle, selecting photovoltaic materials suitable for cold climates, and integrating battery storage solutions to maximize energy retention. By presenting such examples in their submission, engineers can effectively illustrate their ability to address specific project needs while showcasing their technical acumen and creative problem-solving skills.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Action

A client came to us reporting power factor surcharges at several of their terminals. I was responsible for reviewing the existing electrical systems and making recommendations to correct the low power factor issues.

 

Situation

I prepared a report to summarize the findings and provide budget costs for installing the capacitor banks on each of the terminals to raise the overall power factors to levels above 90%. In order for accurately determine the facility power needs we installed temporary electrical meters for ten business days. After analyzing the data collected I determined that a fixed bank was not suitable due to the fluctuations in power that went up to 60% per day. In order to adjust for these fluctuations I determined an automatic stepped capacitor should be used to prevent over voltage conditions which could harm the motors and equipment. I analysed the harmonics at the facility to determine if filters would be required or if I had to adjust for resonance. The voltage and current harmonics were below the recommended levels I determined that filters were not required and resonance was not a concern. I prepared the specifications for each site outlining the size and operating requirements. I was also responsible for:

• Reviewing the bids and providing recommendations for award;
• Reviewing the capacitor bank shop drawings for compliance with the specifications;
• Being the point of contact for the contractor;
• After all deficiencies were dealt with I prepared the final field review reports, deficiency lists, and certificate of completions

 

Outcome

The capacitor banks were installed in accordance with the required specifications and were functional. After three months of completion the ARHs were reviewed and I was satisfied that the overall power factor levels were between the designed 93% and 96%.

 

Understanding Solution Techniques and Independently Verify the Results.

The ability to understand solution techniques and independently verify their accuracy is a cornerstone of professional engineering practice. In the Technical competencies in PEng Competency Based Assessment (CBA), this competency evaluates an engineer’s ability to critically assess engineering principles, analyze the validity of computational results, and ensure that solution techniques are robust and reliable. This is essential for maintaining public safety, project integrity, and compliance with professional standards.

Verification involves a comprehensive understanding of the methods used to derive solutions, whether through manual calculations, computer-based simulations, or advanced modeling software. Engineers must not only demonstrate their technical knowledge but also their ability to identify potential errors, validate results against theoretical principles, and make informed judgments about the adequacy of the solutions. This is one the technical competencies that reflects an engineer’s capacity to uphold quality assurance processes and maintain confidence in their designs.

For example, an engineer using finite element analysis (FEA) software to model stress distribution in a bridge design might describe their approach to verifying the results. This could include cross-checking the computational outputs with hand calculations or established analytical methods to confirm accuracy. They might also participate in an independent review, where they present their methodology, assumptions, and results to colleagues or external validators for critique and validation. Such practices ensure that the solutions meet the required safety and performance standards.

Verification is not limited to computational analysis; it also includes assessing the broader context of solution techniques. Engineers might describe their involvement in validating hydrological models for a flood prevention system, ensuring the assumptions align with field data and historical records. By participating in peer reviews or conducting sensitivity analyses, they can demonstrate their ability to refine solutions and address potential uncertainties.

Including such detailed examples in a PEng CBA submission demonstrates the applicant’s technical proficiency and their commitment to delivering reliable and thoroughly vetted engineering solutions. This competency ultimately ensures that engineers can confidently take responsibility for their work, reinforcing public trust in the profession.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Action

I assisted my supervisor with the safety grounding and power system study. The study included short circuit coordination and arc flash evaluation for a temporary substation.

 

Situation

Under supervision I modeled the system and provided hand calculations to support my report.

• I reviewed the drawings and requested fault information from SaskPower
• Calculations were used for equipment for maximum fault current and circuit breaker ratings which were based on infinite bus method
• The system model was modeled with ETAP software for short circuit evaluation and confirmed the results with the SaskPower fault data.
• Using IEEE 80 and with limits of CEC Table 52 I selected ground fault settings and provided ground potential rise calculations evaluating step and touch potentials.
• Using NETA standards I provided the field services to verify the ground fall of potential testing, circuit breaker and relay commissioning

 

Outcome

This situation gave me understanding on solution techniques and the required codes and standards required to assess that a substation is suitable through

 

Knowledge and Awareness of Canadian Regulations, Codes, and Standards Pertaining to Safety

Safety is a paramount concern in engineering, and the ability to apply Canadian safety regulations, codes, and standards is crucial for ensuring public and workplace protection. In the PEng Technical competencies Competency Based Assessment (CBA), this competency evaluates an engineer’s ability to integrate safety considerations into all aspects of their work, from design and operations to maintenance and project execution. Applicants must demonstrate not only technical proficiency but also a deep commitment to safeguarding human lives and mitigating risks.

A key component of this competency, among the rest of technical competencies, involves identifying and incorporating safety considerations specific to the Canadian context. This includes participating in safety reviews, adhering to local safety procedures, and selecting appropriate safety equipment. Engineers must demonstrate their knowledge of regulations like the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) and related provincial standards, showcasing their ability to implement safety measures that comply with these frameworks.

For example, an engineer working on an industrial plant design might describe their role in incorporating safety considerations into system operations. This could involve reviewing safety procedures, ensuring compliance with Canadian standards for hazardous material handling, and specifying safety equipment such as pressure relief valves and fire suppression systems. Additionally, they might highlight their participation in a safety audit, where they identified potential risks and recommended process modifications to mitigate them.

Incorporating explicit human and public safety considerations is another critical aspect. Engineers must account for safety risks not only in operational processes but also in the broader context of public interaction with infrastructure or systems. For instance, an engineer designing a public transportation system might focus on minimizing risks by integrating emergency exits, signage, and anti-slip surfaces in stations and vehicles. These measures reflect a proactive approach to human safety and public well-being.

Applicants are also expected to demonstrate their understanding of safety risks associated with engineering processes and their ability to select appropriate protective measures. This could involve choosing safety interlocks in automated systems, implementing fail-safe mechanisms, or designing maintenance procedures to minimize exposure to hazards. By detailing such contributions, engineers illustrate their capability to anticipate and address safety concerns effectively.

By presenting detailed examples of how they integrate safety considerations into their work, applicants show their readiness to assume the responsibilities of a licensed professional engineer. This competency underscores their commitment to maintaining the highest standards of safety and their understanding of the vital role safety plays in engineering practice within Canada.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Action

In each of my high voltage projects it is a requirement that I identify and incorporate or participate in a review of all safety considerations, safety procedures and equipment that apply to each of the system operations and maintenance program.

 

Situation

• I was responsible for leading each safety meeting, ensuring onsite safety measures are taken and applying safety standards to ensure a safe work environment. This included field level risk assessments before and after changes in site conditions.
• Applying CSA Z462 I assessed the arc flash hazards of the electrical equipment and made suggestions to the EOR for mitigation strategies and the PPE requirements
• Keeping CEC CSA 22.1 and the safety of employees and the public I designed the electrical distribution on each project.

 

Outcome

Projects were completed on budget to the satisfaction of the client and met all safety requirements. I practiced safety by design principles and practiced safe work practices.

 

Understanding of Systems as Well as Components of Systems

In the Technical competencies in PEng Competency Based Assessment (CBA), understanding systems and their components is a critical competency that highlights an engineer’s ability to approach projects holistically. This skill reflects an engineer’s ability to comprehend not just individual elements of a process but also the interactions and constraints that influence the behavior of the entire system. Demonstrating expertise in this area showcases an engineer’s capacity for systems thinking, a valuable approach for optimizing outcomes and ensuring cohesive functionality.

A robust understanding of each element in a process is the foundation of this competency. Engineers must be able to identify the purpose and role of individual components, ensuring their functionality and compatibility within the larger framework. For example, an engineer working on a water treatment plant might describe their understanding of components such as filtration units, pumps, and chemical dosing systems, detailing how each contributes to the overall water purification process.

Beyond individual elements, engineers must demonstrate their ability to analyze the interactions and constraints of the system as a whole. This involves evaluating how components work together, identifying dependencies, and addressing any constraints that could affect system performance. For instance, an engineer designing a renewable energy microgrid could illustrate how solar panels, battery storage, and power inverters interact to provide reliable energy while accounting for constraints such as fluctuating demand, storage capacity, and grid integration.

Managing processes within the overall system is another critical aspect of this competency. Engineers are expected to monitor system performance, identify inefficiencies, and make necessary modifications to achieve optimal outcomes. For example, an engineer managing a manufacturing assembly line might describe how they monitored throughput, identified bottlenecks in a specific stage, and implemented process adjustments to improve overall efficiency and reduce downtime.

The ability to think systematically is particularly valuable in multidisciplinary projects where multiple variables and components must be coordinated to achieve project goals. By presenting detailed examples of their role in understanding and optimizing systems, applicants demonstrate their readiness for independent engineering practice. This competency not only reflects technical expertise but also an engineer’s ability to adapt to complex, dynamic challenges in real-world scenarios.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Action

The client requested a complete electrical upgrade of an industrial warehouse. I was responsible for working on a re design of the control and distribution system, installing new instruments, cable, cable tray and PLC panels. The mechanical equipment was not updated.

 

Situation

The most challenging part of this project was integrating the new electrical equipment into the older mechanical equipment. It was important that I had a good understanding of the existing system and integration of all components.
After inspecting the machines I reviewed the machine in detail to check the existing instruments, motors and cable trays. The control system had some existing instruments that were not used, not connected or not connected in a series. After discussion with the client I removed some of the instruments in the new design and had all instruments connected directly to the PLC.

 

Outcome

A report was written and tables were generated with inspection findings and mode of operation of the machine. The report also explained cable sizing and protective device settings.

 

Exposure to All Stages of the Process/Project Lifecycle

In the Technical competencies of Competency Based Assessment (CBA), exposure to all stages of the process or project lifecycle is a key competency that evaluates an engineer’s ability to engage comprehensively with projects from inception to evaluation. This competency ensures applicants understand how projects progress through various phases, requiring technical, operational, and managerial contributions at each stage. It highlights the engineer’s role not just as a technical expert but as a well-rounded professional capable of addressing diverse aspects of project execution.

The lifecycle begins with Identification, where engineers contribute to generating the initial project idea and creating preliminary designs. At this stage, engineers demonstrate their ability to identify client needs, explore feasible solutions, and propose conceptual designs. For instance, an applicant working on a renewable energy project might detail their involvement in identifying viable locations for wind turbines based on geographic and environmental data.

Next is Preparation, where detailed designs are developed to address technical specifications and operational requirements. Engineers must collaborate with stakeholders to refine designs and ensure alignment with project goals. For example, an applicant could describe their role in designing a water distribution system, including hydraulic calculations, material selection, and compliance with local regulations.

The Appraisal stage involves a multi-faceted analysis of the project from technical, financial, economic, social, and environmental perspectives. Engineers are expected to balance these aspects to ensure the project’s feasibility and sustainability. For instance, a transportation engineer might discuss how they evaluated the economic benefits and environmental impacts of a proposed highway expansion to optimize design choices.

In the Preparation of Specifications and Tender Documents phase, engineers are responsible for drafting clear, accurate specifications, managing tender processes, and evaluating bids. This stage showcases their ability to translate technical requirements into actionable documents. For example, an engineer might highlight their work in preparing tender documents for a structural retrofit, ensuring clarity for contractors and alignment with design criteria.

The Implementation and Monitoring phase focuses on executing project activities while maintaining oversight to ensure progress and quality. Engineers must manage tasks, resolve issues, and incorporate ongoing feedback. An applicant might describe supervising the construction of a high-rise building, detailing how they addressed unexpected challenges, ensured compliance with safety standards, and kept the project on schedule.

Finally, the Evaluation stage involves assessing project outcomes and documenting lessons learned. Engineers provide feedback that informs future projects, emphasizing a commitment to continuous improvement. For example, an engineer working on a manufacturing plant upgrade might detail their post-implementation review, analyzing the efficiency of new processes and recommending adjustments for future designs.

By demonstrating involvement across all stages of the lifecycle, engineers showcase their ability to contribute holistically to project success. This competency reflects a deep understanding of how technical, financial, and operational aspects intertwine, underscoring the applicant’s readiness for independent engineering practice.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Action

I managed from construction to completion an upgrade relating to energy savings in the lighting systems for a school district.

 

Situation

I identified and prepared a report on potential upgrades in existing buildings to determine ways to reduce energy consumption without reducing lighting levels in the schools. The report included budget costs for three design concepts. A tender package was prepared and posted to allow contractors to bid on it. Throughout the project I was responsible for the following;

• Conducting tours and answering questions with bidders of each building
• Reviewing each RFP and providing recommendations to the school board
• Organizing and meeting with the successful contractor. Acting as a liaison between the contractor and school board
• Reviewing shop drawings
• Preparing contemplated change notices and change orders as required
• Conducting the final field review and issuing a final report outlining the deficiencies found Issuing the completion certificate

 

Outcome

The project was completed to the satisfaction of the client and the calculated energy savings were able to be claimed toward the target for the energy
management program.

 

Understanding of the Role of Peer Review and Quality Management

Peer review and quality management are integral to maintaining the high standards expected of professional engineers in Canada. In the Technical competencies of PEng Competency Based Assessment (CBA), this competency evaluates an applicant’s ability to ensure accuracy, reliability, and compliance in their engineering work through systematic checks and collaborative review processes. It underscores an engineer’s responsibility to uphold public safety and deliver results that meet technical and operational requirements.

A key aspect of this competency is conducting thorough checks, including field verifications, to validate designs. Engineers must demonstrate their ability to assess whether a design aligns with project specifications and functions as intended. For example, an applicant might detail their role in performing site inspections during the construction of a wastewater treatment plant to confirm that installations matched the approved designs and addressed any discrepancies promptly.

Engineers are also expected to adhere to Quality Management principles, following established guidelines provided by provincial or territorial regulators. This may include the Authentication of Documents, the Use of the Seal, and methods for reviewing work prepared by others. By demonstrating knowledge and application of these practices, engineers ensure their work complies with professional and regulatory standards. For instance, an applicant could describe authenticating design documents for a structural retrofit, ensuring the integrity of calculations and adherence to building codes.

Preparing quality control plans is another critical component. These plans detail the frequency and parameters of tests for specific processes or products, providing a framework for consistent quality assurance. For example, an engineer might describe developing a quality control plan for a bridge construction project, specifying material tests and tolerances to ensure structural integrity and durability.

In addition to creating plans, engineers must evaluate test results, determine their adequacy, and develop corrective actions when necessary. This process demonstrates an engineer’s ability to identify issues, assess their impact, and implement effective solutions. For instance, an applicant might highlight their analysis of material test failures during a pipeline project and the subsequent adjustments made to meet design specifications.

Peer review is another cornerstone of this competency. Engineers must demonstrate their ability to participate in or lead peer review processes, ensuring that designs and methodologies are critically assessed by qualified professionals. An applicant might describe their role in organizing peer reviews for an industrial facility’s mechanical systems, where team discussions led to enhanced safety measures and operational efficiency.

Finally, engineers must ensure that completed projects, systems, or subsystems meet their objectives in terms of functionality and performance. For example, an engineer might describe their role in finalizing a solar power system, verifying its output capacity and operational efficiency before handing it over to the client.

By providing detailed examples of their involvement in quality management and peer review, applicants highlight their commitment to professional excellence and their readiness to independently manage engineering responsibilities. This competency reflects an engineer’s ability to maintain high standards, collaborate effectively, and ensure the safety and reliability of their work.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Action

I was responsible for designing and managing the installation of eighteen vehicle charge stations (EVC) at eight multi unit corporate buildings. This included preparing drawings and specifications with pricing from contractors and managed the construction phase from start to completion.

 

Situation

Two site visits included my supervisor, the remaining six sites I reviewed on my own. During each review I was responsible for:
Reviewing the proposed locations for the EVC to ensure proximity to electrical rooms and panels

• Mapping and routed the wire and conduit runs to the EVA from the electrical room
• Reviewing the electrical panels for service size and voltage
• Calculating voltage drops for service runs
• Calculating added loads to the panel boards to verify electrical systems would not be overloaded
• My supervisor provided me with feedback which I then incorporated into my methodology for each site.

 

Outcome

The project was successfully completed and I gained additional review skills for all stages of the project from design to construction.

 

Transfer Design Intentions to Drawings and Sketches; Understand Transmittal of Design Information to Design Documents

The ability to translate design intentions into clear and actionable drawings, sketches, and documentation is a critical skill for professional engineers. In the Technical competencies in Competency Based Assessment (CBA), this competency evaluates an applicant’s capability to effectively communicate technical ideas, ensuring designs are accurately implemented and meet both client expectations and regulatory requirements. This competency highlights the importance of clarity, precision, and thoroughness in the design and documentation process.

A fundamental aspect of this competency is the ability to review designs prepared by others and provide constructive feedback. Engineers must assess designs for accuracy, functionality, and compliance with project goals, and communicate their findings clearly, including suggestions for alternatives where necessary. For example, an applicant might describe reviewing structural designs for a high-rise building, identifying areas for improvement, and proposing cost-effective solutions to enhance stability and compliance with local codes.

Another key element is demonstrating the ability to communicate design ideas and concepts effectively to project team members. This involves breaking down complex technical information into understandable terms, facilitating collaboration, and ensuring all stakeholders are aligned. For instance, an engineer working on a bridge construction project could describe how they presented design alternatives to the client and contractor, explaining the trade-offs in materials, costs, and durability.

The competency also emphasizes the importance of project completion reports and lessons learned reports. These documents capture valuable insights that can inform future projects, promoting continuous improvement in engineering practices. For example, an applicant might highlight their role in preparing a lessons learned report for a power plant upgrade, detailing the challenges encountered during installation and recommending process improvements for similar future projects.

Finally, producing high-quality sketches, notes, documentation, and design drawings is central to this competency. Engineers must ensure that their design deliverables are clear, precise, and comprehensive, serving as a reliable basis for project implementation and regulatory approval. For instance, an applicant could describe creating detailed CAD drawings and technical specifications for a municipal water pipeline system, ensuring that contractors could easily interpret and execute the designs while meeting regulatory standards.

By providing examples of how they have successfully transferred design intentions into actionable deliverables, applicants demonstrate their ability to bridge the gap between conceptual ideas and practical execution. This competency underscores the importance of communication, collaboration, and meticulous documentation in engineering practice, ensuring that projects are carried out efficiently and effectively.

 

Electrical Engineering Sample – APEGS

Action

When working on the lighting upgrades I was responsible for the initial investigation and the concept design phase. I was responsible for following up with the detailed design and the implementation of the approved design

 

Situation

The lighting upgrades required preparation of layout drawings and specifications for bid documents which required both itemized and unit pricing.
The drawings for the tender package included the following details and information:

• Installation for concrete bases and underground service trenches
• Each location for new lightening to be installed
• Labels for each light type and pole heights for new poles
• Control zones for each type of lighting
• Locations of each electrical service feed

 

Outcome

The contractor was able to follow the drawings I provided with little direction required to complete the new lighting and control systems.

 

Conclusion

The PEng Technical competencies of Competency Based Assessment (CBA) is more than just a licensing requirement—it’s an opportunity for engineers to showcase their expertise, problem-solving skills, and readiness for independent practice. Competencies such as risk analysis, peer review, quality management, and translating design intentions into actionable deliverables are essential for ensuring public safety, project success, and adherence to professional standards.

By effectively aligning your experience with the CBA competencies and presenting clear, detailed examples, you can confidently demonstrate your qualifications for licensure as a Professional Engineer (P.Eng.). Each competency you fulfill brings you one step closer to earning this prestigious designation and advancing your professional career.

Ready to make your Competency-Based Assessment process smoother? Try CBA Pro, an AI-powered solution designed to simplify your PEng CBA submissions. With tools to guide you through crafting strong examples, providing personalized feedback, and ensuring alignment with CBA requirements, CBA Pro is your partner in success. Take the next step in your engineering journey today!